From Textbook of Cardiology
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Table 4. Size of treatment effect
|
|
Class I
Benefit >>> Risk
|
Class IIa
Benefit >> Risk
Additional studies with focused objectives needed
|
Class IIb
Benefit ≥ Risk
Additional studies with broad objectives needed; additional registry data would be helpful
|
Class III
Benefit ≥ Risk
No additional studies needed
|
|
Procedure/treatment should be performed/administered
|
It is reasonable to perform/administer treatment
|
Procedure/treatment may be considered
|
Procedure/treatment should not be performed/administered since it is not helpful and may be harmful
|
Level A
Multiple (3-5) population risk strata evaluated
|
- Recommendation that procedure or treatment is useful/effective
- Sufficient evidence from multiple randomized trials or non-randomized trials
|
- Recommendation in favor of treatment or procedure being useful/effective
- Some conflicting evidence from multiple randomized trials or meta-analyses
|
- Recommendation’s usefulness/efficacy less well established
- Greater conflicting evidence from multiple randomized trials or meta-analyses
|
- Recommendation that procedure or treatment not useful/effective and may be harmful
- Sufficient evidence from multiple randomized trials or meta-analyses
|
Level B
Limited (2-3) population risk strata evaluated
|
- Recommendation that procedure or treatment is useful/effective
- Limited evidence from single randomized trial or non-randomized studies
|
- Recommendation in favor of treatment or procedure being useful/effective
- Some conflicting evidence from single randomized trial or non-randomized studies
|
- Recommendation’s usefulness/efficacy less well established
- Greater conflicting evidence from single randomized trial or non-randomized studies
|
- Recommendation that procedure or treatment not useful/effective and may be harmful
- Limited evidence from single randomized trial or non-randomized studies
|
Level C
Very limited (1-2) population risk strata evaluated
|
- Recommendation that procedure or treatment is useful/effective
- Only experts opinion, case studies, or standard-of-care
|
- Recommendation in favor of treatment or procedure being useful/effective
- Only diverging expert opinion case studies, or standard-of-care
|
- Recommendation’s usefulness/efficacy less well established
- Only diverging expert opinion case studies, or standard-of-care
|
- Recommendation that procedure or treatment not useful/effective and may be harmful
- Only expert opinion case studies, or standard-of-care
|