Brugada Syndrome: Difference between revisions

From Textbook of Cardiology
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 33: Line 33:
|BrS1
|BrS1
|#601144  
|#601144  
|SCN5A  
|''SCN5A''
|Na<sub>v</sub>1.5  
|Na<sub>v</sub>1.5  
|&alpha; subunit of I<sub>Na</sub> channel  
|''&alpha;'' subunit of I<sub>Na</sub> channel  
|Loss of function of I<sub>Na</sub>
|Loss of function of I<sub>Na</sub>
|-
|-
|BrS2  
|BrS2  
|#611777  
|#611777  
|GPD1-L  
|''GPD1-L''
|G3PD1L  
|G3PD1L  
|Not fully established  
|Not fully established  
Line 47: Line 47:
|BrS3  
|BrS3  
|#611875  
|#611875  
|CACNA1C  
|''CACNA1C''
|Ca<sub>v</sub>1.2
|Ca<sub>v</sub>1.2
|&alpha;<sub>1C</sub> subunit of I<sub>Ca,L channel</sub>
|''&alpha;''<sub>1C</sub> subunit of I<sub>Ca,L channel</sub>
|Loss of function of I<sub>Ca,L</sub>
|Loss of function of I<sub>Ca,L</sub>
|-
|-
|BrS4  
|BrS4  
|#611876  
|#611876  
|CACNB2b  
|''CACNB2b''
|Ca<sub>v</sub>&beta;2b
|Ca<sub>v</sub>''&beta;''2b
|&beta;2b subunit of I<sub>Ca,L</sub> channel
|''&beta;''2b subunit of I<sub>Ca,L</sub> channel
|
|Loss of function of I<sub>Ca,L</sub>
|-
|-
|BrS5  
|BrS5  
|#612838  
|#612838  
|SCN1B  
|''SCN1B''
|Na<sub>v</sub>&beta;1
|Na<sub>v</sub>''&beta;''1
|&beta; subunit of I<sub>Na</sub> channel
|''&beta;'' subunit of I<sub>Na</sub> channel
|Loss of function of I<sub>Na</sub>
|Loss of function of I<sub>Na</sub>
|-
|-
|BrS6  
|BrS6  
|#613119  
|#613119  
|KCNE3
|''KCNE3''
|KCNE3 (MiRP2)
|KCNE3 (MiRP2)
|&beta; subunit of voltage-dependent K<sup>+</sup> channels
|''&beta;'' subunit of voltage-dependent K<sup>+</sup> channels
|Gain of function of I<sub>to</sub>
|Gain of function of I<sub>to</sub>
|-
|-
|BrS7  
|BrS7  
|#613120  
|#613120  
|SCN3B  
|''SCN3B''
|Na<sub>v</sub>&beta; 3
|Na<sub>v</sub>''&beta;'' 3
|&beta; subunit of I<sub>Na</sub> channel
|''&beta;'' subunit of I<sub>Na</sub> channel
|Loss of function of I<sub>to</sub>
|Loss of function of I<sub>Na</sub>
|-
|-
|NC  
|NC  
|#613123  
|#613123  
|''HCN4''
|HCN4  
|HCN4  
|HCN4
|''&alpha;'' subunit of I<sub>f</sub>
|&alpha; subunit of I<sub>f</sub>
|Gain of function of I<sub>f</sub>
|Gain of function of I<sub>f</sub>
|-
|-
|NC
|NC
|
|
|CACNA2D1  
|''CACNA2D1''
|Ca<sub>v</sub>&alpha;<sub>2</sub> &delta;-1
|Ca<sub>v</sub>''&alpha;''<sub>2</sub>''&delta;''-1
|</sub>&alpha;<sub>2</sub> &delta; subunit of I<sub>Ca,L</sub> channel
|</sub>''&alpha;''<sub>2</sub>''&delta;'' subunit of I<sub>Ca,L</sub> channel
|Loss of function of I<sub>Ca,L</sub>
|Loss of function of I<sub>Ca,L</sub>
|-
|-
|NC
|NC
|
|
|''MOG1''
|MOG1  
|MOG1  
|MOG1
|Regulates trafficking of Na<sub>v</sub>1.5 to the membrance
|Regulates tra?cking of Na<sub>v</sub>1.5 to the membrance
|Loss of function of I<sub>Na</sub>
|Loss of function of I<sub>Na</sub>
|-
|-
|NC
|NC
|
|
|KCND3  
|''KCND3''
|K<sub>v</sub>4.3
|K<sub>v</sub>4.3
|&alpha; subunit of I<sub>to</sub> channel
|''&alpha;'' subunit of I<sub>to</sub> channel
|Gain of function of I<sub>to</sub>  
|Gain of function of I<sub>to</sub>  
|-
|-
|NC
|NC
|
|
|KCNE1L (KCNE5)
|''KCNE1L<br /> (KCNE5)''
|KCNE1L
|KCNE1L
|&beta; subunit of voltage-dependent K<sub>+</sub> channels
|''&beta;'' subunit of voltage-dependent K<sub>+</sub> channels
|Gain of function of I<sub>to</sub>
|Gain of function of I<sub>to</sub>
|-
|-
|NC
|NC
|
|
|KCNJ8  
|''KCNJ8''
|K<sub>ir</sub>6.1
|K<sub>ir</sub>6.1
|&alpha; subunit of I<sub>K,ATP</sub>
|''&alpha;'' subunit of I<sub>K,ATP</sub>
|Gain of function of I<sub>K,ATP</sub>
|Gain of function of I<sub>K,ATP</sub>
|-
|-
|NC
|NC
|
|
|SCN1B''b''  
|''SCN1Bb''  
|Na<sub>v</sub>&beta;1B
|Na<sub>v</sub>''&beta;''1B
|&beta; subunit of I<sub>Na</sub>
|''&beta;'' subunit of I<sub>Na</sub>
|Loss of function of I<sub>Na</sub> and gain of function of I<sub>to</sub>
|Loss of function of I<sub>Na</sub> and Gain of function of I<sub>to</sub>
|-
|-
|colspan="6" bgcolor="#99CCFF"|OMIM: Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man compendium of human genes and genetic phenotypes; BrS1–BrS7: Brugada syndrome types 1–7; NC: no consensus; I<sub>Ca,L</sub>: L-type calcium current; I<sub>f</sub>: hyperpolarization-activated current; I<sub>K,ATP</sub>: ATP-sensitive potassium current; I<sub>Na</sub>: fast sodium current; I<sub>to</sub>: transient outward potassium current.
|colspan="6" bgcolor="#99CCFF"|OMIM: Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man compendium of human genes and genetic phenotypes; BrS1–BrS7: Brugada syndrome types 1–7; NC: no consensus; I<sub>Ca,L</sub>: L-type calcium current; I<sub>f</sub>: hyperpolarization-activated current; I<sub>K,ATP</sub>: ATP-sensitive potassium current; I<sub>Na</sub>: fast sodium current; I<sub>to</sub>: transient outward potassium current.

Revision as of 23:23, 17 January 2013

Typical ECG abnormalities in Brugada syndrome: ST elevation in V1-V3, without ischemia.
Typical ECG abnormalities in Brugada syndrome
Dr. Pedro Brugada. Pedro and Josep Brugada described in 1992 a landmark publication with a case-series of 8 patients with sudden cardiac death. [1] Currently, three brothers of the Brugada family (Pedro, Josep and Ramon Brugada) conduct research in the syndrome that has been named after them.
The SCN5a gen is located on the short arm (p) of chromosome 3

The Brugada syndrome is an hereditary disease that is associated with high risk of sudden cardiac death. It is characterized by typical ECG abnormalities: ST segment elevation in the precordial leads (V1 - V3).

Characteristics of the Brugada syndrome:

  • Inheritable arrhythmia syndrome with autosomal dominant inheritance. If one of the two parents is affected, each child (both males and females) has a 50% chance of inheriting the disease.
  • Males are more often symptomatic than females, probably by the influence of sex hormones on cardiac arrhythmias and/or ion channels, and a different distribution of ion channels across the heart in males versus females.
  • The arrhythmias usually occur in patients between 30 and 40 years of age. (range 1-77 yrs) and often during rest or while sleeping (high vagal tone).
  • In only about 30% of patients, genetic defects can be detected in the (SCN5A) gene which encodes the cardiac sodium channel (loss-of-function mutation). In much smaller quantities, mutations may be found in the GPD1L gene (which probably influences cardiac sodium channel function) or in cardiac calcium channel encoding genes (CACNxxx). In the remaining patients, the disease is probably multi-genetic or caused by yet unknown genetic defects.
  • The right ventricle is most affected in Brugada syndrome, and particularly (but not specifically) the right ventricular outflow tract .
  • The prevalence varies between 5-50:10.000, largely depending on geographic location. In some southeast Asian countries the disease is considered endemic and believed to be the second cause of death among young men (after car accidents). In these countries Brugada syndrome is believed to underly (in part) the 'Sudden Unexpected Death Syndrome' (SUDS). This relation has, however, not been thoroughly investigated and there are almost no epidemiological studies into Brugada syndrome ECGs (apart from Japan). In different Asian countries, different names have been given to SUDS: in the Phillipines it is called bangungut (to rise and moan in sleep) and in Thailand lai tai (death during sleep).

The Brugada brothers were the first to describe the characteristic ECG findings and link them to sudden death. Before that, the characteristic ECG findings, were often mistaken for a right ventricle myocardial infarction and already in 1953, a publication mentions that the ECG findings were not associated with ischemia as people often expected.[2]

Genes linked to the Brugada Syndrome

Table 2: Here is a list of the Genes linked to the Brugada syndrome.
Type OMIM Gene Protein Functional role in cardiomyocytes Effect of mutation
Autosomal dominant inheritance
BrS1 #601144 SCN5A Nav1.5 α subunit of INa channel Loss of function of INa
BrS2 #611777 GPD1-L G3PD1L Not fully established Loss of function of INa
BrS3 #611875 CACNA1C Cav1.2 α1C subunit of ICa,L channel Loss of function of ICa,L
BrS4 #611876 CACNB2b Cavβ2b β2b subunit of ICa,L channel Loss of function of ICa,L
BrS5 #612838 SCN1B Navβ1 β subunit of INa channel Loss of function of INa
BrS6 #613119 KCNE3 KCNE3 (MiRP2) β subunit of voltage-dependent K+ channels Gain of function of Ito
BrS7 #613120 SCN3B Navβ 3 β subunit of INa channel Loss of function of INa
NC #613123 HCN4 HCN4 α subunit of If Gain of function of If
NC CACNA2D1 Cavα2δ-1 α2δ subunit of ICa,L channel Loss of function of ICa,L
NC MOG1 MOG1 Regulates trafficking of Nav1.5 to the membrance Loss of function of INa
NC KCND3 Kv4.3 α subunit of Ito channel Gain of function of Ito
NC KCNE1L
(KCNE5)
KCNE1L β subunit of voltage-dependent K+ channels Gain of function of Ito
NC KCNJ8 Kir6.1 α subunit of IK,ATP Gain of function of IK,ATP
NC SCN1Bb Navβ1B β subunit of INa Loss of function of INa and Gain of function of Ito
OMIM: Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man compendium of human genes and genetic phenotypes; BrS1–BrS7: Brugada syndrome types 1–7; NC: no consensus; ICa,L: L-type calcium current; If: hyperpolarization-activated current; IK,ATP: ATP-sensitive potassium current; INa: fast sodium current; Ito: transient outward potassium current.

Diagnosis and treatment

  • Patients who are symptomatic (unexplained syncopes, ventricular tachycardias or aborted sudden cardiac death) may have a symptom recurrence risk of 2 to 10% per year. In these patients an ICD implant is advisable. Further, life-style advice is given (see below).
  • Some groups advise an electrophysiological investigation (inducibility of ventricular fibrillation) for risk assessment in Brugada patients,[3][4] but others could not reproduce the predictive value of these tests,[5][6] so the value of inducibility is controversial.
  • In large studies familial sudden death did not appear to be a risk factor for sudden death in siblings.
  • In asymptomatic patients in whom the Brugada ECG characteristics are present (either spontaneously or provoked by fever or sodium channel blockers like ajmaline, procainimde or flecainide) life style advice is given. This advice includes:
    • A number of medications should not be taken (including sodium channel blockers and certain anti-depressants and anti-arrhythmics, see www.BrugadaDrugs.org)
    • Rigorous treatment of fever with paracetamol/Tylenol, as fever may elicit a Brugada ECG and arrhythmias in some patients.
  • Spontaneous Type I ECGs do appear to be more prevalent in patients who experienced symptoms.

For a full list of the diagnostic criteria, see [7]

Electrocardiographic criteria

Changed lead positions of leads V3 and V5 to increase the sensitiviy to 'catch' a Brugada pattern on the ECG

Three ECG repolarization patterns in the right precordial leads are recognized in the diagnosis of Brugada syndrome.

Type I is the only ECG criterion that is diagnostic of Brugada syndrome. The type I ECG is characterized by a J elevation >=2 mm (0.2 mV) a coved type ST segment followed by a negative T wave (see figure). Brugada syndrome is definitively diagnosed when a type 1 ST-segment is observed in >1 right precordial lead (V1 to V3) in the presence or absence of a sodium channel–blocking agent, and in conjunction with one of the following:

  • documented ventricular fibrillation (VF)
  • polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT)
  • a family history of sudden cardiac death at <45 years old
  • coved-type ECGs in family members
  • inducibility of VT with programmed electrical stimulation
  • syncope
  • nocturnal agonal respiration.

The sensitivity of the ECG for Brugada syndrome can be increased with placement of ECG leads in the intercostal space above V1 and V2 (V1ic3 and V2ic3)

Electrocardiograms of Brugada patients can change over time from type I to type II and/or normal ECGs and back. A type III ECG is rather common and is considered a normal variant, but also the Type II is a normal variant (albeit suggestive of Brugada syndrome).

A recent study suggests that fractionation of the QRS complex is a marker of a worse prognosis in Brugada syndrome.[8]

ST segment abnormalities in the different types of Brugada syndrome[9]
Type I Type II Type III
J wave amplitude >= 2mm >= 2mm >= 2mm
T wave Negative Positive or biphasis Positive
ST-T configuration Coved type Saddleback Saddleback
ST segment (terminal portion) Gradually descending Elevated >= 1mm Elevated < 1mm


External links

References

  1. Brugada P and Brugada J. Right bundle branch block, persistent ST segment elevation and sudden cardiac death: a distinct clinical and electrocardiographic syndrome. A multicenter report. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Nov 15;20(6):1391-6. DOI:10.1016/0735-1097(92)90253-j | PubMed ID:1309182 | HubMed [Brugada]
  2. OSHER HL and WOLFF L. Electrocardiographic pattern simulating acute myocardial injury. Am J Med Sci. 1953 Nov;226(5):541-5. PubMed ID:13104407 | HubMed [osher]
  3. Brugada J, Brugada R, Antzelevitch C, Towbin J, Nademanee K, and Brugada P. Long-term follow-up of individuals with the electrocardiographic pattern of right bundle-branch block and ST-segment elevation in precordial leads V1 to V3. Circulation. 2002 Jan 1;105(1):73-8. DOI:10.1161/hc0102.101354 | PubMed ID:11772879 | HubMed [brug2]
  4. Brugada P, Brugada R, Mont L, Rivero M, Geelen P, and Brugada J. Natural history of Brugada syndrome: the prognostic value of programmed electrical stimulation of the heart. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003 May;14(5):455-7. DOI:10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.02517.x | PubMed ID:12776858 | HubMed [brug3]
  5. Priori SG, Napolitano C, Gasparini M, Pappone C, Della Bella P, Giordano U, Bloise R, Giustetto C, De Nardis R, Grillo M, Ronchetti E, Faggiano G, and Nastoli J. Natural history of Brugada syndrome: insights for risk stratification and management. Circulation. 2002 Mar 19;105(11):1342-7. DOI:10.1161/hc1102.105288 | PubMed ID:11901046 | HubMed [priori]
  6. Eckardt L, Probst V, Smits JP, Bahr ES, Wolpert C, Schimpf R, Wichter T, Boisseau P, Heinecke A, Breithardt G, Borggrefe M, LeMarec H, Böcker D, and Wilde AA. Long-term prognosis of individuals with right precordial ST-segment-elevation Brugada syndrome. Circulation. 2005 Jan 25;111(3):257-63. DOI:10.1161/01.CIR.0000153267.21278.8D | PubMed ID:15642768 | HubMed [eckhardt]
  7. Antzelevitch C, Brugada P, Borggrefe M, Brugada J, Brugada R, Corrado D, Gussak I, LeMarec H, Nademanee K, Perez Riera AR, Shimizu W, Schulze-Bahr E, Tan H, and Wilde A. Brugada syndrome: report of the second consensus conference. Heart Rhythm. 2005 Apr;2(4):429-40. DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.01.005 | PubMed ID:15898165 | HubMed [Wilde]
  8. Morita H, Kusano KF, Miura D, Nagase S, Nakamura K, Morita ST, Ohe T, Zipes DP, and Wu J. Fragmented QRS as a marker of conduction abnormality and a predictor of prognosis of Brugada syndrome. Circulation. 2008 Oct 21;118(17):1697-704. DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.770917 | PubMed ID:18838563 | HubMed [Morita]
  9. Wilde AA, Antzelevitch C, Borggrefe M, Brugada J, Brugada R, Brugada P, Corrado D, Hauer RN, Kass RS, Nademanee K, Priori SG, Towbin JA, and Study Group on the Molecular Basis of Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology. Proposed diagnostic criteria for the Brugada syndrome: consensus report. Circulation. 2002 Nov 5;106(19):2514-9. DOI:10.1161/01.cir.0000034169.45752.4a | PubMed ID:12417552 | HubMed [Wilde2]

All Medline abstracts: PubMed | HubMed